When I was in trouble in my life, and at times delicate, I realized that the worst thing was not so much, that in itself, are living, but the legal proceedings.
the court can more or less likely to respond in a situation of confrontation, contrast: there stands before the judge, you look in the eye and, aware of ourselves, he is told: "Look, but what the hell you're saying, I'm not like that!" and down with explanations.
But when you are not fully aware, and I defy anyone to be in certain moments, these reactions?
In short, there are times where things do not understand where the emotional involvement is so strong that you can not tap into any explanation of anything che possa finalmente fornire una soluzione a tutto: a noi stessi, agli altri, a chi ci giudica.
Una situazione psicologica delicata ingigantisce tutto ciò che ci sta intorno, i nostri movimenti risultano più enfatici, le risposte inadatte, sembrano cariche di errori e di orrori…una spirale dalla quale è difficile uscire fuori senza il bisogno di un aiuto.
E’ proprio questo “ingrandimento delle cose”, la causa che mi faceva, e certe volte fa tuttora, avere paura di essere giudicato.
It 's a situation where the emotions you away from reality and makes you immediately tangible joining the cry most of the instances of the soul: the use (and sometimes angry) to a higher aid.
What will God, who will be the intangible, to be who you want.
we go back to him. You choose "all'inafferrabile desire to be helped," in your infinite impotence, from what we see to be the only possible solver comparatively to the latter.
good mind you, is not the unconditional admission of the existence of a God, but the hope of salvation, about his exit from the situation.
began working for empathy, I try to see if my reasoning is correct in all respects.
I put on the side of the Church, I put myself on the side of the atheists, I stand by the laity ...
It seems to me that everything is fine.
And then, "I return to my own mind, my fragile at times so strong and the desire not to be tried, but recognized.
not want to get involved in discussions about a lot of opportunities Church or not to enter the debate over the decisions that fall on everyone's life, it is a fact on which I ask myself all the time.
I just want to say to both parties: the church and non-church (allow me the antithesis) not to forget the importance of tone, and their ability to split the soul in pain for a condition on which this is racks his brains over which surely suffer.
Because even those who abort a human being, even a gay man un essere umano, anche io sono un essere umano: persone che, come chiunque, pervase dalla delicatezza psicologica di un momento, non vorranno certo sentirsi perseguitati, oltre che dalla propria coscienza e da quella collettiva, perfino da Dio, “l’inafferrabile” al quale credo che invece si siano rivolte.
E non è un bel provare.
Poi si può discutere di tutto: in una discussione ci sono i locutori (in genere estranei, emotivamente) e gli ascoltatori (qualche volta coinvolti, emotivamente) and among them there are those who believe not.
And I believe that God, if it exists, even look at them with tenderness.
As to all.
(already published on the website Centopassi in 2005)
0 comments:
Post a Comment